Agile methodology for documentation
Process Type: Team Methodology
Applies to: Uyuni documentation team operations
Framework: Docs-as-Code with Agile practices
Review Cycle: Continuous improvement through retrospectives
Overview
The Uyuni documentation team operates using an agile methodology centered around a docs-as-code approach. This methodology treats documentation with the same rigor and processes as software development, ensuring quality, collaboration, and continuous improvement.
Our agile framework combines:
- GitHub-based planning for transparency and tracking
- Collaborative workflows for knowledge sharing
- Iterative delivery of documentation improvements
Core Principles
Docs-as-Code Philosophy
Version Control:
- All documentation stored in Git repositories
- Changes tracked through pull requests and commits
- Branching strategies align with software development practices
Collaboration:
- Peer review processes for all documentation changes
- Shared ownership and collective responsibility
- Cross-functional collaboration with development teams
Automation:
- Continuous integration for documentation builds
- Automated testing and validation
- Deployment pipelines for documentation delivery
Quality Assurance:
- Systematic review processes
- Consistency through style guides and templates
- Regular quality audits and improvements
Meeting Cadence and Structure
Daily Standups (Slack-based)
Format: Asynchronous Slack communication
Frequency: Daily
Purpose: Quick status updates and coordination
Structure:
- What did you work on yesterday?
- What are you working on today?
- Any blockers or impediments?
- Any help needed from the team?
Benefits:
- Maintains team awareness without disrupting deep work
- Flexible timing across time zones
- Written record for reference
- Quick identification of blockers
Weekly Retrospectives
Schedule: Every Thursday
Duration: 45-60 minutes
Participants: Full Uyuni/MLM team
Agenda:
- What went well this week? (5-10 minutes)
- What could be improved? (10-15 minutes)
- Action items from previous retrospective (5-10 minutes)
- New action items and owners (10-15 minutes)
- Process improvements (10-15 minutes)
Outcomes:
- Continuous process improvement
- Team alignment and communication
- Issue identification and resolution
- Culture of learning and adaptation
Biweekly Team Review Meetings
Schedule: Every two weeks
Duration: 60-90 minutes
Participants: Documentation team + stakeholders
Purpose:
- Review completed work and deliverables
- Discuss upcoming priorities and planning
- Coordinate with other teams and projects
- Share knowledge and best practices
Agenda:
- Sprint review - Completed work demonstration (20-30 minutes)
- Metrics and analytics - Team performance and project status (10-15 minutes)
- Upcoming work - Next sprint planning discussion (20-30 minutes)
- Stakeholder feedback - Input from product and development teams (10-15 minutes)
- Team updates - Process changes and announcements (5-10 minutes)
Core Team Meetings
Schedule: As needed, typically weekly (Wednesday)
Duration: 30-45 minutes
Participants: Core team leads and key contributors
Focus Areas:
- Strategic planning and roadmap alignment
- Resource allocation and capacity planning
- Cross-team coordination and dependencies
- Escalation and decision-making for complex issues
GitHub-Based Planning
Project Management
Planning Tools:
- GitHub Projects for kanban-style workflow management
- Issues for task tracking and requirements documentation
- Milestones for sprint and release planning
- Labels for categorization and prioritization
Workflow States
Backlog Management:
- Backlog: Prioritized list of upcoming work
- Ready: Items prepared for active development
- In Progress: Currently being worked on
- Review: Under peer review or stakeholder review
- Done: Completed and delivered
Issue Lifecycle
Creation and Refinement:
- Issues created with clear descriptions and acceptance criteria
- Labels applied for categorization (priority, type, area)
- Assignment to appropriate team members
- Estimation and planning discussions
Execution and Tracking:
- Regular status updates in issue comments
- Linking to related pull requests and branches
- Progress tracking through project boards
- Completion verification and closure
Collaboration Workflows
Code Review Process
Pull Request Standards:
- Clear description of changes and rationale
- Reference to related issues and requirements
- Self-review completed before requesting reviews
- Appropriate reviewers assigned based on expertise
Review Criteria:
- Content accuracy and technical correctness
- Style consistency with team guidelines
- Completeness of documentation coverage
- User experience and accessibility considerations
Knowledge Sharing
Documentation Standards:
- Consistent formatting and structure
- Clear writing and appropriate audience targeting
- Regular updates and maintenance
- Cross-references and linking strategies
Team Learning:
- Regular sharing sessions during team meetings
- Documentation of lessons learned and best practices
- Mentoring and pair working opportunities
- External training and conference participation
Continuous Improvement
Metrics and Measurement
Key Performance Indicators:
- Documentation coverage and completeness
- Review cycle time and quality
- User feedback and satisfaction scores
- Team velocity and capacity utilization
Regular Assessment:
- Weekly retrospective feedback
- Monthly team health and satisfaction surveys
- Quarterly process effectiveness reviews
- Annual methodology and tool evaluations
Adaptation and Evolution
Process Refinement:
- Regular evaluation of meeting effectiveness
- Tool and technology updates
- Workflow optimization based on team feedback
- Integration of industry best practices
Learning Culture:
- Experimentation with new approaches
- Failure tolerance and learning opportunities
- External best practice adoption
- Team skill development and growth
Best Practices
Meeting Effectiveness
Preparation:
- Clear agendas distributed in advance
- Pre-meeting material review
- Action item tracking and follow-up
- Time management and focused discussions
Participation:
- Active engagement from all team members
- Respectful and constructive communication
- Balanced speaking time and inclusive discussions
- Documentation of decisions and next steps
Planning Excellence
Estimation and Capacity:
- Realistic work estimates based on historical data
- Buffer time for unexpected work and interruptions
- Regular capacity planning and resource allocation
- Stakeholder communication about timelines and priorities
Quality Focus:
- Definition of done criteria for all work items
- Regular quality audits and improvement initiatives
- User-centered design and feedback integration
- Continuous testing and validation processes
Tools and Technology
Primary Tools
Planning and Tracking:
- GitHub Projects and Issues
- GitHub Milestones and Labels
- Team calendars and scheduling tools
Communication:
- Slack for daily standups and informal communication
- Video conferencing for formal meetings
- Email for external stakeholder communication
Documentation:
- Git repositories for version control
- Markdown and MDX for content creation (This documentation)
- Asciidoctor and Antora for enterprise-level documentation
- Automated build and deployment pipelines
- Analytics and performance monitoring tools
Integration Points
Development Team Coordination:
- Shared project boards and issue tracking
- Regular cross-team communication
- Aligned release cycles and planning
- Joint retrospectives and improvement initiatives
This agile methodology ensures that the documentation team operates efficiently, collaboratively, and continuously improves while delivering high-quality documentation that serves our users effectively.